Stunning as it is that a University would impose these kinds of restrictions on adults, nothing should surprise us when the liberals running higher education put their minds to a new agenda item. Thrasher’s bold proclamation stated that a “new normal” of behavior was needed by FSU students. Meanwhile, on his own staff, an FSU Deputy General Counsel (lawyer) was charged and convicted in a child porn/sex sting and another FSU employee was removed from her office at Doak Campbell Stadium relating to murder charges of her former husband. Despite this, there has been no official plan or comment from FSU on any “new normal,” taxes, fees or programming for its employees. This leads us to the logical conclusion that stopping the behavior of sexually deviant and murderous employees is less important for FSU than punishing an easily targeted group of students after one accidently drank himself to death.
Of course, fraternity men are viewed by the left with great suspicion because they embrace tradition, are predominantly white, allegedly often conservative and perhaps in some cases from wealthy families. What better target could the left find than this group? But as offensive as John Thrasher’s paternalism and Amy Hecht’s empire and reputation building exercise may be, what is more offensive is the lack of fight in FSU’s fraternity men.
