In an electrifying decision by a California federal jury, Slovakian software powerhouse ESET emerged unscathed from allegations by competitor Finjan. The latter, an Israeli firm, had accused ESET of infringing upon its trio of anti-malware program patents. Picture this as two tech gladiators battling it out in a digital Colosseum, each with their shields of patents and swords of accusations.
Finjan Software Patent Case : Delving into the Heart of the Controversy
At the crux of the lawsuit, Finjan claimed that ESET products blatantly infringed on six of its patents. It was like saying ESET took a page out of Finjan’s playbook, especially with one patent detailing a method of scanning incoming content from the internet using a specific set of rules.
Yet, the narrative took a dramatic twist. The initial trial, which kicked off in March 2020, was suspended due to the looming shadow of the COVID-19 pandemic. Much like an intense movie paused at its climax, the case awaited its conclusion.
A Semantical Showdown: The Definition of “Downloadable”
The term “downloadable” became the talk of the town. Was it about the size, or was there more beneath the surface? ESET threw a punch by challenging its ambiguity, but their argument was initially pushed aside. It seemed like Finjan had the upper hand when in March 2021, five of its patents were declared invalid due to their “indefiniteness.”
