Key Legal Allegations
The lawsuit, filed on November 4 in Suffolk County Superior Court, claims that Progressive:
1. Denied Gondola collision and comprehensive auto insurance coverage
2. Refused to offer optional insurance coverages through a “binding restriction”
3. Misrepresented its duty to offer optional coverages to customers
Lawsuit Details
Three weeks after purchasing her auto insurance policy, Gondola was involved in a three-vehicle collision that totaled her vehicle. Progressive subsequently denied her claim.
Class Action Scope
The class includes all Massachusetts Progressive Direct Insurance Co. customers who were denied the opportunity to purchase optional insurance coverage from November 4, 2020, to November 4, 2024.
By Samuel A. Lopez – USA Herald
[MASSACHUSETTS] – Massachusetts residents are accustomed to certain protections when it comes to auto insurance. Unlike many states, Massachusetts requires insurers to offer collision coverage to drivers, with only a handful of exceptions outlined by law. So, when Danielle Gondola, a resident of the Bay State, purchased a policy from Progressive Direct Insurance Co., she expected the standard suite of coverages, including collision. However, according to a recent class-action lawsuit filed against Progressive, Gondola was allegedly denied the opportunity to purchase this crucial protection.
A “Binding Restriction” That Binds Consumers, Not the Law
The crux of the lawsuit hinges on Progressive’s alleged use of a so-called “binding restriction” to deny Gondola collision coverage. The complaint, filed in Suffolk County Superior Court on November 4, 2024, argues that Progressive never explained the legal basis for this restriction and how it could supersede Massachusetts law. This raises a critical question: Is Progressive putting its own rules ahead of the rights of Massachusetts drivers?
Unfortunately, Gondola’s story doesn’t end with the denial of collision coverage. Just three weeks after purchasing her policy, she was involved in a three-vehicle accident that totaled her car. As expected, she filed a claim with Progressive, only to be met with yet another denial. The lawsuit alleges that Progressive has a “systemic, pre-determined refusal” to offer optional coverages due to this “binding restriction,” leaving Massachusetts drivers potentially vulnerable in the event of an accident.
A Pattern of Practices?
This lawsuit isn’t the first time Progressive has faced scrutiny over its claims practices. In March 2023, a separate Massachusetts class action suit against Progressive alleged the company undervalued total loss vehicles. While that case was partially dismissed, it raises concerns about a potential pattern of behavior by the insurance giant. Additionally, Progressive settled a similar case filed in New York earlier this year for a staggering $48 million, suggesting this might be a nationwide issue.
While Progressive boasts a doubling of its Q3 profit compared to 2023, despite significant hurricane losses, the company’s financial success is overshadowed by the allegations in this lawsuit. The question remains: is Progressive prioritizing its bottom line over the rights and needs of its Massachusetts customers?
Gondola’s lawsuit seeks not only compensation for her denied claim but also aims to represent a broader class of Massachusetts drivers who may have been denied the opportunity to purchase optional coverages due to Progressive’s “binding restriction.” The lawsuit demands a jury trial and unspecified damages, including actual, statutory, and treble damages.
Gondola v. Progressive Direct Insurance Co., No. [Docket Number Not Yet Assigned], Suffolk County Superior Court (filed Nov. 4, 2024).
This case is ongoing, and USA Herald will continue to follow developments. In the meantime, Massachusetts drivers are encouraged to review their auto insurance policies and understand their rights when it comes to coverage options.
Samuel A. Lopez covers legal and insurance beats for USA Herald.
Author’s Bio – Samuel A. Lopez
USA Herald is a trusted source for news and information, committed to delivering in-depth, investigative journalism.
