FOLLOW US

In a dramatic twist of events, industry giants dependent on imported solar equipment are rallying for an en banc review after a Federal Circuit panel recently upheld the president's authority to modify solar safeguard tariffs. The decision, made as the tariffs were winding down, has sparked a fierce legal battle that promises to reshape the landscape of the solar industry.

Solar Cos Call For Review In Safeguard Case : Industry Groups Seek Rehearing

On Monday, the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) and three prominent importers were granted until Jan. 11 to submit their petition for a rehearing. The three-judge panel had initially set a deadline of Dec. 28, but the plaintiffs successfully secured a two-week extension to navigate the challenges posed by the holiday season, a move supported by the Biden administration.

Solar Cos Call For Review In Safeguard Case : A United Front Emerges

The SEIA, along with NextEra Energy Inc., Invenergy Renewables LLC, and EDF Renewables Inc., declared their intent to file the petition, as revealed in their motion for an extension. This united front underscores the significance of the case and the potential ramifications it holds for the solar industry.

Court Orders Presidential Authority Affirmed

The controversy stems from a Nov. 13 ruling by U.S. Circuit Judges Alan D. Lourie, Richard G. Taranto, and Leonard P. Stark, instructing the U.S. Court of International Trade to uphold the president's authority in imposing safeguard duties. This decision is linked to former President Donald Trump's 2020 move to add bifacial solar modules to the list of equipment subject to tariffs, a measure aimed at safeguarding the domestic solar sector.

Both the Trump and Biden administrations have defended the action, asserting its alignment with executive authority.

Precedent Favors Presidential Authority

Recent appeals on national security duties have seen the Federal Circuit relying on its established precedent, which generally supports the president's statutory interpretation. This occurs unless a "clear misconstruction" of the law is evident, showcasing the legal complexities at play.

Despite the gravity of the situation, both the SEIA and the involved companies remained tight-lipped, offering no comments in response to requests as of Tuesday.

Solar Cos Call For Review In Safeguard Case : Legal Eagles in the Arena

In this legal showdown, the government is being represented by Joshua E. Kurland, Brian M. Boynton, Tara K. Hogan, and Patricia M. Mccarthy from the U.S. Department of Justice's Civil Division. On the opposing side, SEIA is represented by a team from Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, including Matt Nicely, Julia K. Eppard, Devin S. Sikes, James Edward Tysse, and Daniel Martin Witkowski.

Invenergy Renewables LLC is represented by Amanda S. Berman, John B. Brew, Larry Eisenstat, and Robert L. Lafrankie of Crowell & Moring LLP, while EDF Renewables Inc. is in the capable hands of Kevin Michael O'Brien and Christine Streatfeild of Baker McKenzie.

As the legal saga unfolds, the solar industry awaits the outcome, knowing that the results could reverberate far beyond the confines of the courtroom.