Sprint Strikes $3.5M Deal in Pension Dispute

81
SHARE
Sprint Strikes $3.5M Deal
The logo of U.S. mobile network operator Sprint Corp at a store in San Marcos, California August 3, 2015. REUTERS/Mike Blake

In a dramatic turn of events, a federal court in Kansas is on the brink of approving a monumental $3.5 million settlement, a deal that would bring an end to a heated class action lawsuit against Sprint Communications. This legal battle, spearheaded by three ex-employees, accused the T-Mobile subsidiary of employing outdated mortality rates to figure out retirement pension payments, a move that sparked widespread controversy.

Enter Email to View Articles

Loading...

From Allegations to Settlement: The Journey

Kevin McFadden, David Schmidt, and Peter Doncevic, the trio at the heart of this lawsuit, have pushed the court to validate this settlement. This agreement is their ticket out of the legal labyrinth, letting them sidestep the uncertainties of battling their unique legal argument in court, an argument yet to be tested in trial.

Their accusations against the telecom giant were severe: they claimed Sprint blatantly violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. How? By using antiquated life expectancy tables and interest rates to convert single life annuities into joint and survivor annuities, effectively shortchanging retirees planning for their spouse’s financial future.

Sprint Strikes $3.5M Deal in Pension Dispute: The Settlement’s Impact

“The settlement will notably hike the monthly pension checks for class members. This boost isn’t just a one-time affair; it’s a lifelong benefit, extending to their beneficiaries as well,” the motion highlighted. This deal not only ends the legal tussle for the three former Sprint employees but also earmarks $5,000 for each of them.