FOLLOW US

In a significant legal victory, TikTok and its user community have successfully obtained a preliminary injunction against a Montana law aiming to ban the popular social media app within the state's borders. U.S. District Judge Donald W. Molloy ruled on Thursday that the statute overreaches state authority and potentially violates the First Amendment.

The Ban's Overreach: Infringing on Federal Authority and Free Speech

The Montana TikTok ban, with its explicit focus on China as an adversary, likely intrudes on the United States' foreign policy interests, thereby facing preemption under federal law. Judge Molloy highlighted that the law's outright ban of TikTok not only limits First Amendment speech but also fails to pass even intermediate scrutiny review.

Montana's Defense: Targeting Alleged Foreign Threats

Defending the ban as a consumer protection measure, Montana's legislature and attorney general aimed to shield residents from China's alleged influence via TikTok. However, Judge Molloy noted that the record leans heavily towards the state targeting China rather than protecting consumers.

A Preliminary Ruling with Long-Term Implications

While the ruling is preliminary, Montana's Department of Justice emphasized its potential evolution as the case proceeds. The state looks forward to presenting a full factual record to defend the law designed to guard against data misuse by the Chinese Communist Party.

Legal Tussle: TikTok and Its Users Fight Back

Following the law's enactment, a swift legal counterattack emerged. A coalition of TikTok users, including content creators, filed a lawsuit seeking to block the law, soon joined by TikTok itself. The app challenged the ban as constitutionally inconsistent and based on unfounded claims of data access by China.

Diverse Stakeholders: Amicus Briefs and Opposing Views

The case attracted a wide range of stakeholders. The Computer & Communications Industry Association, a tech lobbying group, argued against the ban, citing violations of free expression. Conversely, a group of 18 states supported Montana's stance, viewing the ban as a legitimate consumer protection effort.

Judge Molloy's Analysis: Questioning the Ban's Effectiveness

In his analysis, Judge Molloy questioned the ban's effectiveness in protecting consumers from China's alleged threats, noting that other companies also collect user data. He also raised doubts about the law's ability to protect minors, suggesting alternative online avenues remain accessible.

TikTok's Reaction: Celebrating the Upholding of Rights

A TikTok spokesperson lauded the decision, celebrating the continued ability of Montanans to use the platform for self-expression, income, and community building. TikTok users' legal representation echoed this sentiment, praising the ruling for safeguarding constitutional rights.

The TikTok users are represented by a team from Davis Wright Tremaine LLP and Boone Karlberg PC. TikTok's legal defense includes Jackson Murdo & Grant PC and Covington & Burling LLP. The Montana attorney general's office represents the state.