Uncovering the Truth: The Price of an Insurer’s Bad Faith Actions

108
SHARE

In its August petition to transfer, Erie argued that courts have found setoffs to be enforceable if they don’t reduce the insured’s recovery from the tortfeasor and the UIM insurer below the statutory minimum of $50,000. However, the Indiana Supreme Court denied Erie’s petition to transfer, refusing to take up the coverage dispute and allowing Craighead to proceed with her bad faith claim against the insurer.

This case highlights the consequences of bad faith conduct by an insurer. The failure of an insurer to properly investigate and evaluate a claim can lead to severe consequences for both the policyholder and the insurer. Policyholders may be left to bear the financial burden of their loss, while insurers may face bad faith claims and penalties.

As Samuel Lopez, a paralegal and investigative journalist for the USA Herald, has stated, “Insurance bad faith conduct not only harms policyholders but also undermines the integrity of the insurance system as a whole.” It’s important for policyholders to understand their rights and for insurers to fulfill their obligations. Policyholders should consult with legal experts if they believe their insurer has acted in bad faith. Insurers, on the other hand, should ensure that they are conducting fair and thorough investigations of claims and acting in good faith towards their policyholders.