In this article we are going to delve into the “Divorce Industry” and point out some notable cases we found from Broder & Orland that we believe exemplify some of the fundamental flaws in the system.
Over the last couple of weeks, The USA Herald team spent a lot of time reviewing public records and reading hundreds of pages of divorce complaints, motions, settlement agreements, answers, and cross complaints related to Broder & Orland.
Through the process we found a number of cases where there appeared to be conduct by Broder & Orland that was questionable. This law firm is amongst the highest billing and several cases we’ve discovered had parties that may have been left aggrieved.
USA Herald investigates.
Attorneys Have a Specific Set of Rules to Follow
Attorneys have a specific set of rules to follow. These rules ensure that attorneys act in an ethical manner.
In Paasman v. Paasman, a divorce filed in Superior Court in Connecticut (Case No. FST FA 14-40287), public record shows Plaintiff’s Motion for Contempt: Discovery Order, Pendente Lite. It was filed by Rebecca L. Ciota, a licensed attorney and counsel for the First Plaintiff. The motion was filed in September of 2012.
