The Bill of Rights is not a quaint relic of the 1700’s

1404
SHARE

The inconvenient truth here is hard for liberals to reconcile and conservatives must fight the trap liberals lay for them with their limited choices of ways to deal with these tragedies.

What people like Gwen Graham will never accept is that guns are about freedom and they are a part of our guarantee of it. Totalitarians and liberal fascists understand this as banning guns is their first deed upon assuming power as it enables the government easier control of all aspects of people’s lives.

There are lessons to learn from the past. Hitler knew that banning guns was a great way to start his quest for a totalitarian Third Reich.  

Greater firepower is no greater reason to restrict the Second Amendment than the Internet is a good reason to restrict the First

Liberals will argue that the Founders meant “muskets,” not pistols or semi-automatic rifles when they considered the Second Amendment.  This argument is an insult to our history and the great men who wrote our nation’s founding documents.

Gun technology has certainly advanced since the Bill of Rights became the law of the land, but let’s take a look at the advancements in the right to associate and speak relative to guns and the advances of technology related to the First versus the Second Amendment.