FOLLOW US

Key Takeaways

1. Gig Worker Scrutiny: A federal court in California authorized the IRS to serve a John Doe summons on JustAnswer LLC, targeting gig workers who may have underreported income between 2017 and 2020.
2. Increasing State Revenue Efforts: Governor Gavin Newsom’s administration is pushing for additional taxes to address California’s ongoing budgetary concerns, raising controversy among gig workers who rely on side income for financial survival.
3. Counter Argument: Critics argue this action could disproportionately impact individuals who rely on gig work as a secondary source of income, potentially adding to their financial burdens.

By Samuel A. Lopez – USA Herald

(LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA) – Earlier this week, a federal court in California authorized the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to serve a John Doe summons on JustAnswer LLC—a digital platform that pays professionals, ranging from doctors, to tax experts, to answer user-submitted questions. The IRS is investigating whether individuals who provided these expert answers failed to report all their income from 2017 to 2020.

The court order, signed by U.S. District Judge Dolly M. Gee, does not accuse JustAnswer itself of wrongdoing. Rather, the IRS aims to collect information on anonymous taxpayers (the “John Does”) who may not have fulfilled their federal tax obligations. You can read the official Court Order Here.

According to Deputy Assistant Attorney General David Hubbert of the Justice Department’s Tax Division, “This John Doe summons demonstrates that working with the IRS we will use all the tools available to us to ensure that no matter how U.S. taxpayers earn income, they are properly reporting it and paying their taxes. Those who choose to be on the forefront of the gig economy must be aware of, and abide by, all their tax obligations.”

What This Means for Gig Workers

The ruling has ignited debate about whether the state’s enforcement efforts place an unfair burden on people who, in many cases, already struggle with financial security. In my years in the legal field, I’ve seen firsthand how gig workers often rely on secondary income streams—like driving for rideshare services or answering questions on sites likeJustAnswer—to pay their bills.

• Complex Tax Filings: When you juggle multiple gigs, keeping track of income can be cumbersome. Still, the law is clear: all income must be reported, whether it comes with a W-2, 1099, or even unreported cash payments.
• Risk of Underreporting: Some gig workers, unfamiliar with complicated tax rules, might inadvertently omit certain streams of income. The IRS, seeing a gap in reported income, is now taking more aggressive steps to identify these potential discrepancies.
• Fear of Penalties: Many gig workers live paycheck to paycheck, and the specter of back taxes, penalties, and interest adds another layer of stress. It’s not that they’re maliciously avoiding taxes; more often, they lack the resources or knowledge to accurately report earnings.

IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel reinforced this point: “Like their fellow Americans who earn income through traditional means, U.S. taxpayers who earn income from digital and other platforms...need to pay their fair share of taxes.”

However, no conversation about taxes in California would be complete without mentioning Governor Gavin Newsom and his approach to state spending. Critics argue that under his leadership, California’s budget has ballooned, and new tax revenue is being sought to cover the resulting deficits and spending obligations.