Courts Rule Against California Crying Wolf on Cancer

1447
SHARE

In addition, bad science driving bad policy creates unintended consequences that must be acknowledged.  This new form of pseudo-scientific “crying wolf” inevitably undermines the public’s trust in policy and state health leaders. That could lead to more people ignoring important messages. In addition, it contributes to California’s already tarnished reputation as a business destination and a state that needs to grow and needs to improve cost of living and public services cannot afford that.

I love living in Newport Beach. It’s a beautiful Oceanside community in Southern California. It represents everything that’s good about the American dream. I have no wish to see that American dream trampled by unfounded restrictions on our basic rights. Judge Shubb’s decision to place a temporary injunction against the state’s policy of forcing companies to falsely label products as potentially cancerous is a win for California and a win for America.

1
2
3
4
SHARE
Previous articlePennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf Introduces Election Reforms
Next articleTrump Reportedly Wants To Go After Amazon Tax Treatment; AMZN Stock Falls
Charles Laverty
Charles Laverty is a contributing writer to USA Herald and entrepreneur focused on health along with wellness. Charles passion is writing and has a knack for covering tough stories that other journalists shy away from, including but not limited to the fitness industry's profiteering over fixing the obestity epidemic. Charles Laverty is an advocate for health, wellness, and fitness. He has a knack for calling out government for bad policies, incompetence, and anti-democratic actions.