Her mic was cut after she read some graphic passages. Then she said that “pornography is offensive to all people, it is offensive to common decency.”
“There are children in the audience here,” one board member said.
“This board is in violation of the law … this board should be charged accordingly,” Langton shouted to rousing applause from many supporters in the audience, who then chanted “go to jail.”
The district later said it would remove the books to assess their content. But in the meantime, Ms. Langton’s rhetoric could somehow be construed as a threat and be labeled a Federal crime.
Then on Oct. 17, Langton participated in a demonstration dubbed “Parents Are Not ‘Domestic Terrorists’ Rally,” in response to Garland’s memo.
Langton has reportedly received “daily threats” since the protests, which she said she attended with about 45 other parents in her district.
The woman who is being termed a “threat” believes she is being threatened.
“I have threats against my children by name, I have been followed in my car with my children, they have my vehicle, they know where I live, and I don’t know who’s putting somebody up to this, but it’s obviously meant to intimidate me.”
Conflict of Interests?
Republican senators and congressmen, and parent groups claim Garland has a conflict of interest. A left-wing education company called Panorama Education was co-founded by his son-in-law.
