FOLLOW US

In a lawsuit loaded with tension and tech-world drama, IYO Inc. has slammed OpenAI, CEO Sam Altman, and Apple design legend Jony Ive with allegations of willful trademark infringement. The explosive complaint, filed Monday in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, accuses the trio of derailing IYO’s momentum by launching a venture called IO—a homophone of IYO—and copying its pioneering wearable technology.

IYO says the defendants "knew exactly what they were doing" when OpenAI revealed its $6.5 billion acquisition of IO Products Inc. in May, just months after IYO had pitched nearly identical ideas directly to Altman and other members of his inner circle.

“This isn’t coincidence,” the lawsuit states. “It’s calculated brand hijacking.”

The Future, in Your Ear

Founded in 2021, IYO develops screenless AI-powered wearables that allow users to interact with devices without keyboards, screens, or mice. Their flagship product, the IYO ONE, is an ear-worn interface designed to revolutionize human-computer interaction.

Meanwhile, IO’s stated mission? According to filings, to create tech that connects users to the internet and AI—without traditional physical interfaces. IYO claims this is eerily similar to its business model and pitch language.

And it’s not just the mission. IYO alleges that IO’s prototype announcement video mirrors IYO’s vision down to the wording, and asserts that IO’s branding, tone, and timing have sowed confusion in the market—just as IYO was preparing to scale.

"They Sat in Our Demo Chairs, Took Notes, Then Took Our Identity"

The lawsuit outlines a trail of meetings between IYO and individuals who would later emerge as key players in IO’s launch.

In 2022, IYO met with representatives from Altman’s Apollo Projects, Jony Ive’s LoveFrom, and future IO co-founder Evans Hankey—all under the pretense of collaboration. While those talks fizzled, IYO later discovered that a design engineer from IO purchased an IYO product, asked pointed questions about its design files, and now reportedly works for IO’s design team.

“We essentially gave them a front-row seat to our innovation—and they took the stage,” IYO founder said, according to court documents.

From Friendly Pitch to Trademark Turmoil

Earlier this year, IYO even pitched a potential acquisition to OpenAI, fitting seven of their executives with the IYO ONE and presenting proprietary tech. While OpenAI eventually passed, IYO now claims it was a ruse to access trade secrets and branding.

Then came May 21, when OpenAI dropped its bombshell: a sleek IO launch, boasting ambitions identical to IYO’s, complete with talking points allegedly lifted from IYO’s own pitch decks.

Following the announcement, IYO reached out to Altman expressing urgent concerns. But the response was not what they hoped.

“Mr. Altman not only refused to change the name,” the complaint states, “he astonishingly threatened to sue IYO to force them to give up their own name.”

IYO's Future at Risk

With investors rattled, fundraising paused, and its product pipeline in jeopardy, IYO says it is at a make-or-break moment. The startup claims that confusion over the IO name is undermining its credibility and threatening its survival.

IYO is represented by Andrew David Skale of Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC. OpenAI has not yet named legal counsel, and neither OpenAI nor Altman responded to requests for comment.

As the AI arms race escalates and wearable tech becomes the next digital frontier, this lawsuit could mark a defining chapter in the battle for brand ownership in the innovation era.