Google’s FLoC replaces third-party cookies by putting Chrome users into categories based on their internet use (interests and demographics). Google claims it’s a more private alternative to third-party tracking cookies. But many privacy advocates disagree.
Recently there has been a slew of Google-involved lawsuits and settlements regarding its users’ privacy. And if the FLoC testing is successful Google isn’t planning on getting consent to track its users in the future.
Despite Google’s denials, many privacy experts claim that the new technology is just a different way to track people. DuckDuckGo is releasing a Chrome extension that will block the elements used by Google’s new tracking tool. And they published a blog post explaining their objections.
“With FLoC, by simply browsing the web, you are automatically placed into a group based on your browsing history (“cohort”). Websites you visit will immediately be able to access this group FLoC ID and use it to target ads or content at you. It’s like walking into a store where they already know all about you! In addition, while FLoC is purported to be more private because it is a group, combined with your IP address (which also gets automatically sent to websites) you can continue to be tracked easily as an individual.” DuckDuckGo claims.
Open Sourcers Want Privacy and Consent
Meanwhile, Brave vehemently opposes FLoC. They issued a statement saying any feature designed to share information about users and their interests should require an “opt-in” or consent from the user. Brave said in response to Google’s unethical practices, it has removed the program in the Nightly versions of both Brave for Android and Desktop.
