“That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative complaint and unsupported by evidence. In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state. Our people, laws, and institutions demand more. At bottom, Plaintiffs have failed to meet their burden to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.”
Judge Brann says Trump Campaign’s legal argument is like a “Frankenstein Monster”
Former New York City Mayor and Pres. Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani is leading his Campaign’s legal team that lodged lawsuits challenging the election results in Pennsylvania and other key battleground states.
In the lawsuit, Giuliani and his team claimed that the rights of two Pennsylvania voters under the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution were violated. They argued that the state’s decision to give counties the discretion to adopt their own notice-and-cure policy is unconstitutional. Giuliani’s team asserted that the two Pennsylvania voters were not allowed to cure their absentee ballots by their counties. However, other counties such as the Philadelphia County allowed voters to cure their absentee ballots. They claimed that discrepancy is unconstitutional and the court must block the certification of election results in Pennsylvania.
