The Bigger Picture: Judicial Bias as a National Security Threat
The judiciary is supposed to be the neutral guardian of our laws. When judges start legislating from the bench—or worse, aiding fugitives—they fundamentally erode the public trust.
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts recently pushed back against calls for judicial impeachments, insisting that “impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision.”
But critics argue this misses the point. Judicial activism isn’t just about “disagreements”—it’s about national security, systemic fairness, and the integrity of American courts.
And administrative procedures exist precisely because courts cannot afford to let rogue judges sit on the bench for five, ten, or twenty years while cases slog through endless appeals.
Bondi’s warning signals that the Trump administration is taking this issue seriously, with real-time accountability and swift consequences for judicial misconduct.
USA Herald Exclusive: The Next Chapter in Judge Dugan’s Scandal
USA Herald is launching an in-depth investigation into the domestic violence case that Judge Dugan was presiding over when she allegedly helped Flores-Ruiz escape.
Our readers deserve to know:
