FOLLOW US

These aren't layoffs. They're not restructurings. They are permanent eliminations — and the executives running these companies are barely bothering to hide it anymore.

BY SAMUEL A. LÓPEZ·USA HERALD INVESTIGATIVE DESK·APRIL 23, 2026

~8,000

META POSITIONS CUT

8,000+

MICROSOFT BUYOUT-ELIGIBLE WORKERS

$250B+

COMBINED AI SPENDING PLANNED

"We're starting to see projects that used to require big teams now be accomplished by a single very talented person."

— MARK ZUCKERBERG, META CEO

What Meta and Microsoft announced this week isn't a routine workforce adjustment. It isn't belt-tightening after a rough quarter. What both companies did — simultaneously, without coincidence — is confirm what millions of American workers have feared but hoped wasn't true: artificial intelligence is now being used as a direct justification to eliminate human jobs, and the people running the largest technology companies on earth are no longer pretending otherwise.

On Thursday, Meta notified staff that on May 20 it would cut roughly 10% of its entire workforce — close to 8,000 people — while simultaneously closing approximately 6,000 open job postings that will never be filled. The same day, in what can only be described as a coordinated message to the market, Microsoft announced it would offer voluntary buyouts to about 7% of its American workforce, with more than 8,000 employees qualifying under the program's terms.

Same day. Two of the most powerful technology companies in human history. Thousands of jobs gone. And the reason both companies gave, when pressed, was the same: artificial intelligence is doing the work now.

The Numbers Tell the Story They Won't Say Out Loud

META

$115B–$135B
planned AI spending in 2025

MICROSOFT

$110B–$120B
estimated AI infrastructure spend

Meta's chief people officer, Janelle Gale, sent an internal memo to staff that is a masterclass in corporate euphemism. She told employees the cuts would allow the company to "offset the other investments we're making." She never mentioned AI directly. She didn't need to. Mark Zuckerberg already said it plainly on the January earnings call, when he told investors: "We're starting to see projects that used to require big teams now be accomplished by a single very talented person." The meaning couldn't be clearer — if one person with AI can do what ten people did before, nine of those people become overhead.

Gale noted that affected employees would receive "generous severance." That's a cold comfort when your entire career track has just been deemed redundant by an algorithm your employer built with the billions it's saving by not hiring you.

Microsoft's AI Chief Said the Quiet Part Loud

Microsoft's program targets employees whose age plus years at the company equals 70 or greater — a formula that effectively aims buyout packages at the most experienced, senior, and highest-paid members of the workforce. Over 8,000 people qualify.

But Mustafa Suleyman, Microsoft's own chief of AI, did not wait to be asked. In February, he stated publicly that he believes AI will be capable of replacing "most white collar work" within the next 12 to 18 months. That is not a fringe prediction from a tech critic or a Silicon Valley gadfly. That is the head of AI at Microsoft — one of the most influential technology officers on the planet — putting a timeline on the displacement of the professional class.

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella has already claimed that AI is handling as much as 30% of the company's internal coding work. He's described this as a productivity triumph. Workers whose jobs involve coding would likely describe it differently. And Zuckerberg, sitting onstage with Nadella, doubled down: he estimated that within a year, "maybe half the development is going to be done by AI, as opposed to people."

Half. Within a year. From the people who make the decisions.

What They're Not Telling You: You Are the Training Data