A California appellate panel has delivered a consequential ruling, reviving allegations of bias and retaliation against an Apple software subsidiary. In a decision on Tuesday, the court found substantial evidence supporting claims of discrimination and retaliation raised by a former employee, indicating a contentious legal battle ahead.
Apple Unit Must Face Revived Bias And Retaliation Claims: Ruling Highlights Discriminatory Atmosphere
The three-judge panel for California’s Sixth District Court of Appeal affirmed a lower court’s judgment in favor of Apple. However, they reversed the decision regarding the subsidiary, FileMaker Inc., on allegations of discrimination and retaliation brought forth by Linda Cambareri, a former employee.
The panel emphasized that while FileMaker provided reasons for Cambareri’s termination, evidence presented by Cambareri suggests these reasons may be a pretext for discrimination. Notably, the court highlighted inconsistencies in workplace behavior evaluations and contextual evidence indicating bias against older women.
Apple Unit Must Face Revived Bias And Retaliation Claims: Triable Issues Arise
Cambareri’s employment history, dating back to 2006, revealed a pattern of friction with colleagues and management. Documented instances of dissatisfaction and unprofessional behavior culminated in her termination in 2015. Despite efforts to address concerns, Cambareri found herself on paid leave during an investigation, ultimately resigning amid the turmoil.
