FOLLOW US

The serene existence of cloistered Carmelite nuns in Texas has been thrust into the public eye as the nuns continue battling the bishop. Fort Worth Bishop Michael Olsen’s public investigation of Reverend Mother Teresa Agnes Gerlach vow of chastity is finished. 

But the Discalced Carmelite Nuns issued a statement on Saturday indicating the nuns are rejecting a Vatican decree to place them under new authority. The nuns believe that the actions amount to a hostile takeover. And is “effectively putting the fox in charge of the hen house.”

UPDATE: The nuns filed a temporary restraining order against the Catholic Diocese of Fort Worth, Bishop Michael Olson, and The Association of Christ the King in the United States of America after the groups attempted to take control of the monastery.

Cloud Seeding: Torrential Rainstorm in Dubai - USA Herald

Project Nimbus: Google Employees Fired Amid Protest Controversy - USA Herald

Introducing the New Atlas Robot: Boston Dynamics “Oddly Terrifying” Upgrade - USA Herald

Protect Against Ghost Hackers with a Digital Estate Plan - USA Herald

Battling the Bishop

In a statement published Saturday, the nuns said the Vatican issued the decree without their knowledge or consent and that it could threaten individual nuns, the integrity of the monastery and its assets.

“We are not ‘things’ to be traded or given away in back-room deals, but women vowed to the exclusive love and service of Almighty God,” the nuns wrote.

This is the latest development in a bitter and extraordinarily public battle between the nuns and Fort Worth Bishop Michael Olson that has played out in dueling statements and in civil court.

In June the bishop accused the head nun of violating her vow of chastity with a priest years ago and launched an investigation.

The nuns accused Bishop Olson of overstepping his authority, claiming invasion of privacy and harassment. In court they claimed he had hours-long interrogations and seized computers and other property. The nuns were not allowed to have services and the bishop forbid them form their normal religious practices.

Financial Motives

The courtroom became a battleground where allegations flew, ranging from personal impropriety to claims of drug use within the monastery. Amidst these contentious proceedings, questions arose regarding the bishop's motives and the potential financial interests at play.

Speculation swirled regarding the value of the monastery's land and the implications for legacy donations and online revenue. Locals are wondering if the skyrocketing value of the monastery’s 70+ acre tract of land is part of the equation.