FOLLOW US

Case Intel

• Kanye West’s attorneys argue a 2024 sexual assault lawsuit is an effort to punish his controversial public statements rather than address legitimate legal claims.
• Plaintiff Jenn An, a formerAmerica’s Next Top Model contestant, alleges West choked her and forced his fingers down her throat during a 2010 music video shoot.
• The case is shaping up to test the line between artistic expression, personal accountability, and the boundaries of California’s free speech protections.

USA HERALD - Kanye West, one of the most polarizing figures in modern music and culture, is no stranger to controversy. Now, he is asking a Los Angeles County judge to dismiss a sexual assault lawsuit that accuses him of abusing a model during the filming of La Roux’s “In for the Kill” remix back in 2010.

The lawsuit, filed in November 2024 by Jenn An, a reality TV personality from season 13 of America’s Next Top Model, claims that West’s actions during the shoot crossed every possible line. She alleges that West assumed directorial control of the video and, in an unscripted moment, assaulted her while cameras rolled.

According to her complaint, West ordered her to sit, choked her, and shoved his fingers into her mouth while declaring, “This is art. This is f###### art. I am like Picasso.”

The alleged incident lasted more than a minute. An says she struggled to breathe, and that others on set stood by or even encouraged the behavior instead of stopping it. She is now seeking damages for emotional distress and reputational harm.

West’s Counterstrike: Free Speech and Artistic Expression

In a motion filed in August 2025, West’s attorneys pushed back aggressively. They argue the lawsuit has less to do with what happened on set and more to do with West’s inflammatory public persona.

Pointing to references in An’s complaint to West’s past antisemitic remarks and his controversial comments about sexual assault survivors, his legal team says these details are irrelevant to the alleged 2010 incident. Instead, they characterize them as evidence of a broader attempt to silence West because of his views.

“These alleged quotations bear no relevance to the claims in this case and are presented without meaningful context,”his lawyer wrote. “Their inclusion should be considered as facts to support arguments regarding [An’s] motive to bring this lawsuit — to silence [West] for his controversial speech on matters of public concern.”

The defense frames the incident as part of a provocative music video performance — not a crime. West’s team claims the video shoot involved physical interaction between performers, that An never objected, and that she could have walked off set but chose not to.

“At no point during the production did [An] object to her role, express a lack of consent to participate, nor attempt to leave the performance,” the filing states.