- Sudden non-gravitational acceleration events
- A highly collimated jet-spine tail resembling a thrust vector
- A coma that refuses to smear with rotation
- A stable luminosity inconsistent with volatile-driven outgassing
- An anti-tail that aligns more with controlled emission than solar radiation
- An almost total lack of fragmentation debris
- Radio-frequency absorption in OH maser life-linked bands
- Jet structures oriented in ways that contradict standard physics
- A coma too symmetrical, too bright, and too stable
If this were a court case, the pattern of evidence would be overwhelming: something about this object is not behaving according to natural comet mechanics.
And now NASA finally steps into the spotlight.
What NASA MUST Clarify
In the spirit of transparency—and in the interest of public trust—NASA cannot approach this event with rehearsed talking points or evasive generalities.
The American public deserves clear, direct answers on the following:
- Why did 3I/ATLAS experience sudden acceleration without mass loss?
NASA has avoided this question, but independent astronomers have not.
