In a thrilling development on Friday, the Third Circuit issued a decisive order mandating the appointment of an examiner in the bankruptcy case of cryptocurrency titan FTX. The ruling aligns with the argument put forth by the U.S. Trustee’s Office, asserting that such an appointment is not just a choice but a legal necessity.
Panel Backs Trustee’s Call for Compulsory Examiner
A three-judge panel, led by U.S. Circuit Judge L. Felipe Restrepo, fervently endorsed the U.S. Trustee’s Office’s stance. The panel contended that U.S. Bankruptcy Judge John T. Dorsey erred last February by deeming the appointment discretionary, contrary to the law governing cases of this magnitude.
“Sometimes highly complex cases give rise to straightforward issues on appeal,” declared Judge Restrepo, encapsulating the essence of the legal battle.
Third Circuit Orders Examiner in FTX Bankruptcy Battle : Law Speaks Clearly
The trustee, challenging Judge Dorsey’s decision, underscored the Bankruptcy Code’s insistence on an examiner’s appointment in any Chapter 11 scenario with unsecured debts exceeding $5 million. The Third Circuit concurred, emphasizing that the court “shall” appoint an examiner under such circumstances. The crucial phrase “as is appropriate” grants the court the authority to shape the investigation’s scope, rather than bestowing discretion to deny the appointment.
Third Circuit Orders Examiner in FTX Bankruptcy Battle : FTX Counsel’s Resistance Overruled
FTX’s legal team argued against the necessity of an examiner, citing comprehensive reports from new management post-collapse. Despite their claims, the Third Circuit stressed the value of an independent investigation. Concerns lingered about FTX’s bankruptcy counsel’s pre-bankruptcy role and the potential presence of wrongdoers within the company.
Transparency in Focus: Examiner’s Public Report
Unlike internal reports, the examiner’s findings will be made public, as highlighted by the Third Circuit. Considering the “catastrophic” losses suffered by FTX investors and the broader implications for the cryptocurrency industry, the court deemed transparency imperative.
