Legal analyst Elie Honig expressed concern over Willis’ response to a divorce subpoena in the ongoing divorce case. Honig described the response as “very improper,” arguing that a district attorney should not use a criminal case as a shield to avoid testifying in a divorce case.
Relevant Witness
Willis faces a subpoena to testify in Wade’s divorce case, with Honig emphasizing that a subpoena indicates being a witness with relevant information rather than an accusation.
The divorce case has revealed bank statements suggesting that Nathan Wade paid for Willis to fly on two trips. This raises questions about the nature of their relationship. Allegations of financial impropriety, including attempts to conceal marriage assets, layer the legal saga.
Joycelyn Wade, Nathan’s wife, alleges that he filed for divorce just two days after securing the special prosecutor job and is attempting to hide over $550,000 in marriage assets received last year.
Bank statements indicate trips to Miami and San Francisco.
Civil Law
Willis’ attorney filed a motion to prevent her from testifying in the divorce case. The attorney is claiming an abuse of the civil discovery process to harass the district attorney. The motion asserts that Joycelyn Wade conspired with interested parties in the criminal case to use civil proceedings against Willis.
