There’s a pervasive belief that Judge Newman’s investigation, spearheaded by her colleagues whom she interacts with regularly, might lead to potential conflicts of interest. Dolin further highlighted that unlike past cases mentioned by Judge Jones, Newman was suspended even before the commencement of the probe.
Greg Dolin, speaking to Law360, mirrored the sentiment of Judge Jones, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the set regulations for a fair inquiry.
A special committee, led by Chief Judge Moore and inclusive of Judges Sharon Prost and Richard Taranto, suggests barring Judge Newman from taking on new cases for a year. This recommendation hinges on Newman complying with their orders for a medical examination and submitting medical records. However, the probe has been shadowed by allegations of bias and a violation of due process.
In a remarkable move, Judge Newman, defying the committee’s directives, sought a neurologist’s opinion independently, leading her to request a revocation of her suspension.
What Lies Ahead
With tensions escalating, Newman’s attorney, Dolin, disclosed their plans to contest the report’s findings, reaffirming their commitment to challenge the current trajectory of the investigation.
