FOLLOW US

Special counsel John H. Durham has been looking into “Russiagate” since 2019. Then-Attorney General Bill Barr kicked off the Durham investigation into the FBI’s probe of Russian election interference. Politics rather than any real crimes allegedly were the origin of the Robert Mueller Russia investigation.

The investigation into the now-debunked “Steele dossier” compiled by Hillary Clinton’s campaign has been proceeding with limited cooperation from the FBI and DOJ. 

Democratic lawyer Michael Sussman was indicted last year for lying to the FBI general counsel James Baker over whether he was advising Hillary Clinton in 2016. The story that Sussman gave the FBI was during the Trump versus Clinton presidential campaign.

Durham claims that the FBI’s watchdog, DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz, withheld important facts. And Horowitz failed to reveal that he met with Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussman in 2017.

Sussmann is accused of feeding the false Russian interference narrative during the election while advising Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. Sussman told the FBI there were ties between the Trump Organization and a Russian bank. This has since been disproven.

Durham files for info from OIG in Court 

The Office of Inspector General (OIG) told the special counsel that producing all documents with regards to Michael Sussman would be “burdensome if not impossible.”

In December 2021 Durham said, OIG Horowitz turned over a forensic report that claimed “it had ‘no other file or other documentation relating'” to Russiagate. But the prosecutors believe the meeting between Sussmann, and Horowitz has “potential relevance to the charges at hand.” 

According to court documents "The OIG had not previously informed the Special Counsel’s Office of this meeting with the defendant.”  And the filing says that Sussmann and Horowitz met to discuss claims by a client of Sussmann’s (Hillary Clinton). Claims include that an OIG employee was connecting to a VPN in a foreign country.

Durham requests cell phone data

Durham’s office says that it discovered in January that the OIG has two of Baker’s cell phones, along with forensic reports with analysis.

“Since learning of the OIG’s possession of these cell phones, the Government has been working diligently to review their contents for discoverable materials. The Government expects to make those materials available to the [Sussmann] defense later this week.” 

Durham’s office submitted an additional filing clarifying that OIG had requested custody of “a number of FBI cell phones,” including the two owned by Baker, in 2018. And they had never received them.