In a twist worthy of courtroom dramas, Levi & Korsinsky LLP, a renowned law firm, found itself on shaky grounds as it faced a ruling that has potential ramifications beyond the case at hand. The New York federal judge’s decision thrusts the firm into uncharted waters, likening their retaliatory suit to sailing too close to the wind and capsizing under legal scrutiny.
Levi & Korsinsky : The Grounds for Battle
Amy Miller, the firm’s ex-partner, struck the first chord in February 2020, alleging that the firm blatantly disregarded Title VII, the Equal Pay Act, and New York’s anti-discrimination laws. The crux? She was denied fee-based bonuses given to her male counterparts and was shown the door when she dared to seek a raise. In a counter-move that now seems as perilous as walking a tightrope without a safety net, Levi & Korsinsky shot back in June 2020, accusing Miller of cunningly redirecting business to a potential new employer.
Judge Preska’s Astute Observations
In what can be described as throwing a spanner in Levi & Korsinsky’s defensive machinery, U.S. District Judge Loretta A. Preska underscored the absence of concrete facts supporting the firm’s counterclaims against Miller. “Using intuition over evidence?” the judge seemed to muse, emphasizing the importance of evidence-based decisions in such grave matters.
