Preska’s stand on the firm’s denial of a bonus to Miller is akin to highlighting the two faces of a coin – undercompensation on one side and discriminatory pay reduction on the other. Both, she noted, are equally detrimental. The latter might be glaringly apparent, but the hidden venom of the former is just as dangerous, if not more.
Evidence That Can’t Be Overlooked
Noteworthy remarks by Levi & Korsinsky’s name partner, Joseph Levi, about female partners “knowing their place” was a red flag, implying possible discrimination. Moreover, another remark by partner Eduard Korsinsky about working mothers, like Miller, being less effective while working from home, only added fuel to the fire.
Some Claims Dismissed, But the Essence Remains
While the judge did discount Miller’s Equal Pay Act claim, citing reasons of disparity in experience, the overarching themes of the case remained intact. Miller’s assertions that her dismissal was out of illegal retaliation, however, fell flat.
Judge Preska, visibly frustrated by the turn of events in this roller-coaster case, once exclaimed in 2021, “You people are acting like children.” This sentiment hints at the tense and convoluted nature of the proceedings.
Levi & Korsinsky: Awaiting Further Comments
As the dust settles post-ruling, representatives from both sides remain mum, yet to offer any comments on this landmark decision.
