Leading national litigation boutique Susman Godfrey LLP has filed a federal lawsuit in the District of Columbia, strongly challenging a recent executive order issued by former President Donald Trump. The firm calls the directive a “grave threat to the rule of law” and a retaliatory act that violates core constitutional protections.
The executive order, dated April 9, seeks to revoke the firm’s access to federal government buildings, restrict its use of government resources, and pressure contractors to sever ties with the firm. In its filing, Susman Godfrey argues that the order is an unconstitutional retaliation for its legal representation in matters related to the 2020 presidential election, including its defense of Dominion Voting Systems.
“Unless the Judiciary acts with resolve — now — to repudiate this blatantly unconstitutional executive order and the others like it, a dangerous and perhaps irreversible precedent will be set,” the firm stated in its complaint.
The Susman Godfrey Trump Order Rule of Law challenge is the latest in a wave of legal responses from prominent firms targeted by similar orders, including Perkins Coie LLP, Jenner & Block LLP, and WilmerHale, each of which has already secured temporary restraining orders and filed motions for summary judgment.
The firm stresses that an independent legal profession is essential to the rule of law in a constitutional democracy. “Even before American independence, private attorneys have stood for those disfavored by government. That tradition is a cornerstone of justice and democracy,” said a spokesperson for the firm.
The lawsuit asserts numerous constitutional violations, including:
