FOLLOW US

By Samuel A. Lopez, Legal Analyst and Journalist, USA Herald

In a move that has sent ripples through the Department of Justice and ignited a firestorm of political debate, a seasoned DOJ prosecutor, Denise Cheung, tendered her resignation Tuesday, claiming she was pressured to launch a preliminary inquiry into the Biden administration's climate spending. But is this a case of a principled stand against political overreach, or a calculated act of defiance bordering on obstruction?

The Tipping Point: 

• The Request: The prosecutor was asked to conduct a routine preliminary review to determine if a more formal investigation would be warranted.
• The Refusal: Viewing the request as "premature," the prosecutor declined the assignment, and quit.
• The Revelation: The prosecutor then allegedly leaked her resignation letter to the media, raising questions about potential breaches of confidentiality.

Drawing parallels to the infamous case of former FBI Director James Comey, who famously announced his agency's decision not to recommend charges against Hillary Clinton, Cheung's actions raise serious questions about the role of personal bias in the pursuit of justice.

The Resignation: A Matter of Principle or a Political Statement?

According to sources familiar with the matter, Cheung's superior asked her to conduct a preliminary review to determine whether a grand jury investigation would be warranted. However, Cheung, in her resignation letter “leaked” through published media sources, claims that her superiors had asked her to direct a preliminary investigation into an Environmental Protection Agency funding decision during the Biden administration and according to Cheung, she claims she was asked to use DOJ’s powers to freeze that funding.

But here's where the story takes a sharp turn. Instead of fulfilling the assignment – a routine legal task well within her job description – Cheung allegedly used this opportunity to alert a potential target of a potential internal DOJ investigation against them.

Critics argue, that this is akin to a DEA agent tipping off a drug cartel about an impending investigation. Such actions are not only a breach of trust but potentially a grave violation of ethical responsibilities.

Imagine a scenario where a lawyer, after seven years as a D.A. prosecutor, takes a lucrative job in private practice. Her new client is under investigation by her former office, and she decides to use her inside knowledge to help him. The parallel is undeniable. Cheung's alleged disclosure of internal DOJ information constitutes a serious misstep, revealing a troubling bias.

The Chain of Command: Following the Orders

The directive, according to reports, originated from Emil Bove, the department's acting deputy attorney general, to Ed Martin, whom President Donald Trump has nominated to be the permanent DC US Attorney. Cheung, a long-time DOJ employee, was allegedly tasked with initiating a preliminary review – which she terms an "investigation" – into an Environmental Protection Agency funding decision during the Biden administration. The goal, allegedly, was to freeze that funding, if fraud was discovered.