Georgia governor, election chief ordered to explain their opposition to suit demanding inspection of voting machines

0
581

In his ruling, Judge Batten stated that Kemp and Raffensperger have until Wednesday to file a brief explaining their opposition to Powell’s demand for three forensic inspections.

“The brief should be accompanied and supported by affidavit or other evidence, if appropriate,” the judge wrote, adding that Gov. Kemp and Sec. Raffensperger must provide Powell a “copy of the contract between the State and Dominion.”

During the hearing on Sunday, the lawyer representing Gov. Kemp and Raffensperger, and four other members of the state’s Election Board, argued that the secretary of state has no jurisdiction over county election officials. Therefore, the court has no jurisdiction since they are not a party to the case.

Signup for the USA Herald exclusive Newsletter

Additionally, the defendants argued that allowing forensic inspection by experts working for the plaintiffs “would pose substantial security and proprietary/trade secret risks.”

On Monday, the Georgia Democratic Party filed a proposed motion to dismiss Powell’s lawsuit. The party accused Powell of attempting to overturn the will of voters and pushing “debunked conspiracy theories, wild speculation, and unsupported allegations of procedural improprieties recycled from other unsuccessful lawsuits.”