Two separate anomalies—one in radio frequencies, one in jet mechanics—now appear to be part of the same puzzle.
By Samuel Lopez | USA Herald – On November 14, 2025, we reported something no natural comet has ever demonstrated: a narrow-band absorption signature emitted by 3I/ATLAS at precisely 1665 and 1667 MHz—two frequencies associated with the 18-centimeter OH microwave transition long considered by SETI researchers as a prime channel for interstellar communication. Not broad-spectrum noise, not chaotic emissions from solar heating, but a clean, narrow signature at two frequencies that nature rarely produces under these conditions.
Today, November 30, 2025, we reported on something equally strange, but entirely different in origin: one of the clearest images yet of 3I/ATLAS revealing what looks like a pulsing jet structure—brightening and dimming in a periodic rhythm. In his analysis, Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb compared this behavior to a “heartbeat,” noting that the jets appear to pump mass outward every 16.16 hours, a pattern the light-curve analysts initially misinterpreted as rotational variability from the nucleus. But the nucleus is far too dim to produce that degree of variation. The jet is the source. And it is pulsing.
What makes these two developments remarkable is not just that they occurred two weeks apart, but that both follow the same logic: a narrow-band radio signature arising exactly at a moment of peak aerodynamic stress, and a jet that pulses with a period tied to the object’s internal mechanism rather than its rotation.
Both phenomena indicate control—timing—structure. Natural comets produce chaotic outgassing, random jets, and broadband thermal noise. 3I/ATLAS is producing periodicity, selectivity, and narrow-frequency behavior.
Now we have a new form of periodicity: jets that brighten as the object rotates through a specific orientation, producing a heartbeat pattern. The mathematical analysis is straightforward. At an outflow velocity of 440 meters per second, a 16.16-hour cycle would carry newly ejected volatiles roughly 25,600 kilometers outward before the next “pulse.” That distance matches what we see in recent imaging, where the brightness of the coma fluctuates along a band consistent with repeated bursts rather than continuous flow. These are not random eruptions. They are timed releases.
My review of the raw images shows the jets are not only steady in direction but appear to remain anchored to a fixed orientation relative to background stars, even as solar pressure and the object’s own motion should be bending them. This stability is difficult to reconcile with natural dust jets driven by surface heating, which always respond to sunlight and rotation. Here, the behavior suggests an internal outflow mechanism that is firing in a preferred direction independent of solar geometry.
The coincidence between the narrow-band OH-line absorption and the periodic jet pulsations raises a new question: are these two systems—the radio-side anomaly and the mechanical-side anomaly—linked? One possibility, offered by Loeb’s open analysis, is that a technological object may “pulse” outflow as a form of thrust or maneuvering. If that thrust momentarily alters the distribution of OH-rich materials surrounding the object, it could create exactly the kind of narrow-band absorption signature observed. In other words, the jets may not just be expelling mass but modulating the environment around 3I/ATLAS in a predictable way.
If 3I/ATLAS is intelligent or controlled, the next question becomes: what is it doing?
A controlled heartbeat jet could be a propulsion cycle. It could be a stabilization system. It could even be a signal. The absorption lines could be a byproduct of this activity, or something more intentional.
As we approach the December 19 close pass, the timing between the heartbeat jets and any repeat radio absorption should be watched with forensic precision. If the two systems rise and fall in the same rhythm, we may have the strongest case yet that 3I/ATLAS is not behaving like a comet but like a device.
The evidence is accumulating. And it is pointing in one direction.
We will continue monitoring every frame and every frequency as new data emerges.
