Furthermore, Chee argued that the arbitration agreement heavily favored Tesla, particularly limiting the scope of discovery. He was concerned about restrictions on deposing third-party witnesses, but the court clarified that the arbitrator has the authority to order discovery, thus maintaining a balance in procedural fairness.
Background of Chee’s Employment and Termination
Chee, 57 at the time of his dismissal, joined Tesla as a global supply manager in July 2021 at the Palo Alto facility. His termination came after a series of health-related and personal leaves, including one for a heart attack his father suffered and another for his own health issues related to diabetes and congestive heart failure. Chee alleged that his final dismissal was prompted by a jury duty summons, shortly after his return from medical leave, claiming that Tesla favored younger employees and discriminated against him based on his age and health.
Tesla Forces Bias Suit Over Firing Into Arbitration : Legal Representation and Next Steps
Lauren E. Grochow and Daniel M. Kalinowski of Grochow Law represent Chee, while Tesla’s defense is managed in-house by Donna M. Butler. As the case moves into arbitration, the focus will likely shift towards a more private examination of the details and merits of Chee’s claims.
