FOLLOW US

Libman’s case now places that entire machinery under a new and uncomfortable spotlight.

According to the petition, the underlying dispute stems from his role in Jones v. City of Los Angeles, the massive DWP ratepayer class action litigation reportedly involving more than $100 million in claims. 

But Libman argues the real trouble began after the settlement proceedings.

The petition reportedly alleges that Libman uncovered undisclosed connections involving the presiding judge, the Hon. Elihu M. Berle, and attorney Brian S. Kabateck, who was later appointed to investigate the very settlement Judge Berle had approved. The filing further highlights allegations surrounding Judge Berle’s purchase of an expensive residence shortly after approving the initial $67.5 million settlement — facts Libman contends warranted disclosure. 

Those are serious allegations.

And notably, much of corporate media has barely touched that side of the story.

Instead, headlines surrounding Libman largely focused on the existence of an FBI investigation and disciplinary proceedings. But after reviewing portions of the public record and examining the procedural allegations being raised, USA Herald believes the broader public accountability questions deserve scrutiny — particularly when the discipline system itself is being accused of suppressing evidence and silencing a lawyer investigating judicial conduct.

The petition also draws another politically charged connection.

The same hearing judge presiding over Libman’s disciplinary matter, the Hon. Yvette D. Roland, also presided over disciplinary proceedings involving John C. Eastman, — President Trump’s former attorney from post-2020 election controversies, whose own due process arguments were denied review by the California Supreme Court on April 15, 2026.

That overlap is likely to intensify national attention surrounding the California State Bar Court and its internal processes.

One section of Libman’s filing, quoted directly from sworn testimony — moments after his counsel was ordered out of the courtroom, may ultimately become the defining line of this entire legal war:

“Things are being deliberately misrepresented against me for whatever purpose, which I think the purpose is ultimately, is to send a message. The message is, don’t dare investigate judges.”

- Michael Jacob Libman | cited in footnote 9 of the petition.

That statement lands with force because it touches a fear long whispered throughout legal circles but rarely spoken publicly.