FOLLOW US

The Patriot Games may be an athletic contest, but paired with a citizenship reality-show pitch and abortion policies that control women’s bodies, they reveal a government increasingly shaped by spectacle.

The Trump administration has announced a government-backed athletic contest for teenagers. The Patriot Games will air nationwide and award scholarship money as part of the country’s 250th anniversary celebration.

Organizers say the event will test strength, endurance, agility, teamwork, and perseverance. On its face, that sounds like a youth sports competition.

Then you get to the original format: one young man and one young woman from each state and territory. Each would represent a community on national television.

No, I am not claiming that children will be thrown into an arena and forced to fight to the death. The comparison is not literal and pretending that critics believe it only avoids the actual point. The resemblance is in the structure and spectacle. The government selects young regional representatives, packages their stories, and places them before a national audience in the name of patriotism. That is not some obscure interpretation critics invented after the fact. It is the format the administration chose.

The Patriot Games Are Built for Television

The Patriot Games are scheduled for August 9 through August 11, 2026. The competition will stream through the ESPN App and end with a one-hour ESPN on ABC primetime special on August 13. Organizers say athletes between ages 14 and 17 will represent states, territories, and tribal nations, while one male champion and one female champion will share a $250,000 scholarship prize pool.

By itself, the event might look like an awkwardly branded youth contest. But we are not living in a vacuum. Politicians now treat citizenship, patriotism, gender, and bodily autonomy like roles in a nationally produced show.

The Hunger Games Comparison Did Not Come From Nowhere

President Donald Trump first announced the Patriot Games in December 2025 as a competition featuring one young man and one young woman from every state and territory. He also used the announcement to emphasize that transgender girls and women would not compete in female categories.

That detail matters. It shows the Patriot Games were never only about celebrating talented teenagers. From the start, the event also carried the administration’s message about who counts as an acceptable male or female representative.

The current plans have expanded to include athletes from tribal nations. Applicants must submit eligibility information and a short video explaining their story and why they want to compete. A selection committee will then review the applications and choose the finalists.

Organizers still have not released a complete list of events. Teenagers are applying to represent their communities on national television without knowing every competition they may face.

The Similarity Is About Spectacle

Again, that does not make the Patriot Games identical to Suzanne Collins’ fictional arena. The books and films involve violence, death, and an authoritarian government using terror to maintain control. The real Patriot Games are an athletic competition.

But The Hunger Games was never only about violence. It was also about a government turning young people into symbols, assigning them regional identities, packaging their personal stories, and converting competition into national entertainment. That is the part people recognized immediately, and it is the part supporters keep pretending is too ridiculous to discuss.

The administration could have created a national youth sports festival built around teams, cooperation, cultural exchange, and shared celebration. It could have chosen any number of formats that did not echo one of the most recognizable dystopian stories of the modern era. Instead, it selected one boy and one girl to stand in for each jurisdiction and turned the whole thing into primetime spectacle.

Citizenship Was Also Pitched as Reality Television

The Patriot Games would be easier to laugh off if they stood alone. They do not.

In 2025, the Department of Homeland Security acknowledged that it was reviewing a private producer’s proposal for a reality television program called The American. The concept reportedly involved 12 immigrants traveling around the country and competing in American-themed challenges, including mining for gold in California, assembling part of a Model T in Detroit, and making pizza in New York.

The reported ending was the most disturbing part. The winner would conclude the series with a citizenship ceremony at the U.S. Capitol.

To be clear, the White House never approved the program. Television producer Rob Worsoff pitched it, and DHS kept it in the earliest stage of review. The department said then-Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem had not reviewed or endorsed it. The show never reached production.

Those distinctions matter because accuracy matters. Trump did not personally order immigrants to compete for citizenship on television, and the proposal never became official government policy.

That does not make the premise any less grotesque.

Citizenship Is Not a Game-Show Prize

DHS says it receives hundreds of media proposals and reviews them. Fine. That explains how the pitch entered the system. It does not explain why officials treated a show about immigrants performing Americanness as worthy of serious consideration.

Citizenship is not a game-show prize. It is a legal status governed by federal law, eligibility requirements, background checks, interviews, an application process, and an oath. Immigrants should not have to prove they are entertaining enough, marketable enough, or sufficiently American before a studio audience.

The proposal treated naturalization as content. It turned the immigrant experience into a string of challenges designed to create suspense, competition, and elimination. Even though the show never moved forward, the concept belongs to the same political imagination as the Patriot Games: American identity becomes something the government can stage, judge, rank, and broadcast.

One group competes to represent the nation. Another is imagined competing for the right to join it.

The Handmaid’s Tale Is No Longer Just Protest Imagery

Then there is the role this political movement has assigned to women.

For years, protesters have worn red robes and white bonnets to compare abortion restrictions with The Handmaid’s Tale. Critics often dismiss the imagery as dramatic, exaggerated, or hysterical. The data have made that dismissal much harder to defend.

As of March 2026, 13 states had total abortion bans, while seven more enforced limits between six and 12 weeks. Those laws govern millions of women and girls, including people who may not know they are pregnant before the legal window has already closed.

Trump did not write every state abortion ban. He did appoint three Supreme Court justices who joined the majority that overturned Roe v. Wade. He has publicly taken credit for that outcome while arguing that abortion policy should remain with the states.

The Consequences Can Be Counted

The consequences are measurable. Johns Hopkins researchers estimated that abortion bans across 14 states resulted in 22,180 more live births than expected, along with 478 additional infant deaths. A separate 2026 study found evidence consistent with a possible 9.2 percent increase in pregnancy-associated deaths in states with abortion bans, equivalent to an estimated 68 excess deaths by the end of 2023.

Those numbers are not metaphors or political talking points. They represent pregnancies that continued in states where women lost the legal ability to decide whether they wanted to remain pregnant. They also represent infants and women who died.

When State Control Reaches the Emergency Room

The human cost becomes even clearer when you look at individual cases. ProPublica reported that 28-year-old Josseli Barnica arrived at a Texas hospital while miscarrying at 17 weeks. Doctors did not speed up her delivery for approximately 40 hours while the fetus still had cardiac activity.

Her husband said medical staff told her that intervening would be a crime. Barnica later died from an infection.

This was not fiction. It happened in a state where doctors faced severe penalties for violating an abortion ban. That is why The Handmaid’s Tale comparison persists, no matter how often people mock the red robes.

The analogy does not require commanders, ceremonial uniforms, or women dressed in matching colors. The central warning of the story is about a government using ideology to control reproduction and reduce women’s bodies to instruments of state policy.

When a law requires a pregnancy to continue against a woman’s wishes, the state is exercising control over her body. When doctors delay miscarriage care because they fear prosecution, that control reaches directly into the emergency room. When researchers begin counting additional births, infant deaths, and pregnancy-associated deaths after abortion bans take effect, the consequences are no longer theoretical.

They are counted in bodies.

The Common Thread Is State Power as Entertainment

The Patriot Games, the citizenship-show proposal, and abortion bans are not identical policies, and I am not arguing that they are. One is an approved athletic competition. One was an unapproved television pitch. The others are laws enacted by individual states after the Supreme Court removed federal constitutional protections for abortion.

The connection is not administrative. It is cultural.

Each places the government in the role of producer, casting director, judge, or controller. Officials choose teenagers to perform patriotism. They imagine immigrants as contestants proving their worth. State laws force women to continue pregnancies under rules politicians wrote.

The Trump era increasingly feels like a national programming slate where public policy is designed for spectacle. The government does not simply announce a youth competition. It gives the event a dramatic title and turns regional representation into a televised showdown.

It does not simply debate immigration law. A proposal emerges in which citizenship becomes the final prize after a season of themed challenges. It does not merely oppose abortion. The movement celebrates the destruction of a constitutional protection, transfers control to state lawmakers, and expects women to absorb the medical consequences.

This is governance shaped by the instincts of reality television: create conflict, assign roles, control the setting, reward compliance, and keep the audience watching.

Reality Television Has Become a Governing Instinct

Trump built his public identity through reality television, so the pattern is difficult to ignore. The Apprentice trained audiences to see him as the man in charge. He decided who succeeded, who failed, and who deserved removal.

Now the country is the set, and the public has been cast as contestants. The difference is that real government does not reset after the credits roll. The consequences follow people home, into hospitals, across borders, and through the rest of their lives.

A Government Obsessed With Casting the “Right” Americans

The Patriot Games reveal something deeper about this administration’s view of national identity. The competition does not only ask which young athletes are strongest or fastest. Its original format divides representation into one young man and one young woman from each state and territory, and Trump immediately connected that structure to his campaign against transgender participation in women’s sports.

The competition therefore stages the administration’s definition of who qualifies as a proper male or female representative. It is not only about athletic ability. It is also about displaying the identities the administration considers legitimate.

The citizenship-show proposal carried a similar message. Immigrants would prove their knowledge, usefulness, personality, and cultural fit through televised challenges. The underlying question was not merely whether they qualified under federal law. It was whether they could perform an entertaining version of Americanness for an audience.

Women living under abortion bans face another government-imposed definition of their role. Once pregnant, their autonomy becomes secondary to a state policy that requires the pregnancy to continue, sometimes even when serious medical complications arise.

These groups face different policies, but the same instinct appears each time. Officials define the acceptable boy, girl, immigrant, and woman from above. Then the government decides who may compete, who may belong, who must comply, and who gets written out of the script.

Dystopian Fiction Was a Warning, Not a Programming Guide

Supporters of the Patriot Games will say critics are overreacting. They will point out that high school athletic competitions already exist, scholarships help students, and national celebrations have always included spectacle. All of that is true, but context still matters.

The administration built a youth competition around one male and one female representative from each state. That same administration keeps deciding who counts as the right kind of man, woman, immigrant, citizen, or American. It arrives after DHS reviewed a proposal that imagined citizenship as the ending of a reality show.

It also arrives in a country where women have lost control over whether their pregnancies continue and where researchers are documenting increases in births, infant deaths, and possible pregnancy-associated deaths under abortion bans.

One comparison can be dismissed as a joke. Three begin to look like a genre.

The Hunger Games warned about governments turning children and regional identity into entertainment. The Handmaid’s Tale warned about governments controlling women through reproduction. Reality television showed how easily humiliation, judgment, and exclusion could become mass entertainment when packaged as competition. These stories and formats were never supposed to become a governing philosophy.

The United States has not literally become Panem or Gilead. No serious person says it has. The problem is that too many policies now borrow their logic: select the participants, define the acceptable identities, create the spectacle, and convince the audience that watching is the same as participating.

America does not need another government-produced show. It needs a government that remembers its citizens are people, not characters.