Legal Background and Strategic Moves
The Macrons’ lawsuit labels Owens’ podcast content as “outlandish, defamatory, and far-fetched fictions,” aiming to firmly counteract the reputational damage allegedly caused by the claims aired to Owens’ substantial audience. Yet, Owens quickly dismissed the Macrons’ legal actions as “goofy” and a “desperate public relations strategy,” signaling that she perceived the legal move as an opportunity rather than a threat.
Owens’ strategy, as previously reported by USA Herald, revolves around aggressively leveraging the discovery phase of litigation—a tactic that could potentially unveil sensitive or uncomfortable information about the Macrons, thereby applying reciprocal pressure on the plaintiffs.
Discovery Phase Poised for Intense Conflict
The discovery phase is set to be fiercely contested. Owens has indicated plans for extensive discovery demands, which could include, but not be limited to:
- Requests for production of documents
- Requests for admissions
- Form interrogatories
- Special interrogatories
- Requests for production documents and inspection of tangible items
- Depositions of Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron
This comprehensive approach suggests Owens seeks to scrutinize every claim, potentially forcing the Macrons into challenging disclosures or admissions. Should the Macrons resist cooperation, Owens’ legal counsel stands ready to file motions to compel compliance, or seeking attorney’s fees and sanctions for potential discovery violations—tactics that could impose considerable legal, financial reputational burdens.
