By Samuel A. Lopez – USA Herald
March 06, 2025
In a stunning blow to sneaker reseller StockX LLC, a New York federal judge ruled Tuesday that the company is liable for peddling counterfeit Nike kicks, thrusting the high-stakes legal brawl between the two giants into a new chapter. U.S. District Judge Valerie Caproni’s decision, delivered after fiery oral arguments, didn’t just nick StockX—it carved a deep wound, ordering the parties to lock in trial dates this year to hash out the remaining allegations. For sneakerheads and legal eagles alike, this ruling reverberates beyond the courtroom, spotlighting the murky crossroads of resale marketplaces, brand integrity, and consumer trust.
Nike, the titan of athletic footwear, had pushed for summary judgment on claims of counterfeiting and false advertising, alleging StockX knowingly sold fake shoes stamped with its iconic swoosh. While Judge Caproni didn’t fully grant Nike’s wishlist—stopping short of deeming the counterfeiting willful—she pinned StockX to the mat for unloading four bogus pairs to Nike’s investigators and 33 more to a mystery buyer whose testimony remains under wraps. With trial dates looming, the clash promises to unpack a Pandora’s box of trademark disputes, digital deception, and corporate accountability.
Inside the Courtroom
