Beyond the Punchlines: Serious Allegations
While Farmer’s humor drew headlines, the FJQC’s concerns ran deeper. The panel accused him of failing to devote full time to his judicial duties, exceeding his allotted 30 days of leave. More troubling were allegations of bias and denial of due process, with Farmer reportedly showing predetermination in certain cases. These charges, combined with his comedic missteps, painted a picture of a judge whose conduct eroded public trust in the judiciary.
Farmer, a former Florida state senator and Democrat, wasn’t without defenders. His attorney filed a response to the suspension recommendation, arguing that the judge’s jokes were “G-rated dad jokes” meant to reduce stress for defendants and show humanity. “They generally are corny but not offensive and were not degrading to the solemnity of the proceedings,” the attorney wrote. However, Farmer conceded that some remarks, particularly the “racy” ones, were inappropriate. During a probable cause hearing, he apologized, a sentiment he reiterated through his counsel.
The In Living Color incident, Farmer claimed, was an accidental broadcast due to a live microphone, and he expressed regret for the remarks. Yet the FJQC remained unmoved, emphasizing the cumulative impact of Farmer’s actions over time. “Through his extensive misconduct, occurring over a lengthy period of time, Judge Farmer has damaged the public’s perception of the judiciary and the judicial branch,” the panel stated.
