FOLLOW US

Core Insights

1. Unfiltered Reality: The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has overturned a lower court’s dismissal, reviving a class action against Grant Cardone and Cardone Capital for allegedly misleading “everyday investors” with promises of a 15% annual return.
2. Predatory Conduct Spotlight: Despite regulatory warnings, Cardone continued to broadcast his bold 15% return claims on social media, targeting unsophisticated investors—a tactic the appellate court called into question.
3. Broad Implications: The ruling not only breathes new life into Christine Pino’s case, but also opens the door for other investors to join a potential class action, casting a long legal shadow over Cardone’s business empire.

By Samuel Lopez – USA Herald

The Legal Earthquake Shaking Cardone Capital

LOS ANGELES, CA - It’s not every day that the facade of a celebrity investor gets publicly peeled back in federal court. But on June 10, 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down an opinion that not only reverses the lower court’s dismissal of a securities class action against Grant Cardone and his business entities—it also offers a cautionary tale for every Instagram “guru” promising financial miracles.

“You’re Gonna Walk Away with a 15% Annualized Return”

That was the pitch Cardone delivered directly to his audience on Instagram and YouTube. The appellate opinion sets the scene:

“Grant Cardone and the real estate syndicator he founded projected just such an investment return online to unsophisticated investors. Cardone shared his offerings on social media, boasting on Instagram that investors could double their money and telling viewers on YouTube: ‘[Y]ou’re gonna walk away with a 15% annualized return. If I’m in that deal for 10 years, you’re gonna earn 150%... You can tell the SEC that’s what I said it would be... some people call me Nostradamus, because I’m predicting the future dude, this is what’s gonna happen.’”
(See PINO V. CARDONE CAPITAL, LLC, pp. 4-5)

The Real Target: Unsophisticated Investors

The court makes it clear who Cardone’s marketing machine was aimed at:

“Cardone Capital put it, these funds offered an investment opportunity for the ‘everyday investor.’ The Funds made offerings to investors under Regulation A... which allows for the sale of securities through crowdfunding and reduces reporting and accounting requirements.”
(See p. 5)

These “unaccredited investors” are, by SEC definition, individuals who haven’t met the sophistication or wealth criteria to be considered professional investors. In short, they are ordinary people—precisely the demographic most vulnerable to slick social media pitches.