FOLLOW US

Key passages from the opinion

• The panel said plaintiffs “plausibly alleged that [the] drug interdiction program directs the county’s officers to violate passengers’ Fourth Amendment rights” by conducting unreasonable seizures. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
• By contrast, on Equal Protection, the complaint “is devoid of any allegations that any individual defendant acted with a discriminatory purpose,” which doomed those claims at this stage. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

The numbers behind the challenge

Counsel’s records—obtained via open-records requests—report 402 jet-bridge stops over eight months. For the 378 stops with recorded race, 56% involved Black passengers, compared with 8% of domestic travelers at the airport. Plaintiffs’ appellate brief and a subsequent statement by the NYU Policing Project peg the odds of that pattern happening randomly at less than one in one hundred trillion. The brief also notes just three drug seizures and over $1 million in cash taken from 25 travelers, with few charges filed. (These figures are allegations sourced to plaintiffs’ filings, not findings by the court.) The Policing Project

What comes next

The case returns to the Northern District of Georgia, where André and English can pursue discovery on the Fourth Amendment Monell theory against Clayton County. Expect depositions and document requests on training, policies, and weekly stop logs the complaint says officers kept. The panel’s analysis of coercion in the jet-bridge—blocking movement, holding IDs/boarding passes, and questioning in a confined space—will loom large in any renewed motion practice and, potentially, a jury’s assessment. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Broader implications for policing and travel

This ruling underscores a persistent constitutional line: in high-security environments, “consent” isn’t consent if a reasonable traveler wouldn’t feel free to decline. As Barry Friedman of NYU Law’s Policing Project put it, “you may not be seized or searched unless you truly voluntarily consent or the government has at least reasonable suspicion.” The Policing Project

For airport policing nationwide, the opinion offers a cautionary blueprint. Programs branding their stops as “random” or “consensual” must still pass Fourth Amendment muster; municipal exposure can remain even when individual officers are immunized. That split—Monell liability for the county, qualified immunity for officers—could incentivize agencies to rethink jet-bridge and gate-area tactics, training, and documentation.