“The infringements are on a vast scale and involve direct copying of the entirety of the Shein photographs,” Shein’s claim declared, creating a sense of epic proportions in the courtroom.
But the plot thickens. Shein further alleges that Temu manipulated these images in an attempt to cover their tracks. However, Temu has placed the blame squarely on the shoulders of third-party sellers, turning the tables in this gripping legal drama.
Temu and shein Photo Theft : A Web of Complexity
Adding a layer of perplexity to the saga, Temu raises another valid point. The letter from Shein, sent in June, included a staggering 8,036 URLs of purportedly infringing photos. Temu contends that this letter failed to raise alarm bells because the claim that Shein owned the copyrights was, in their words, “untrue.”
Moreover, Temu argues that the three-day window given to respond to the letter was wholly unrealistic, making it impossible to delve into its intricate contents.
Temu and shein Photo Theft : Legal Standoff
As the legal standoff reaches its zenith, a central point of contention arises. Temu vehemently asserts that Shein lacked the standing to make these demands at the time of their claim. According to Temu, Shein did not possess an exclusive license from its parent company to use these pictures when the letter was dispatched; this exclusive license was only granted in July, a twist in the tale that adds complexity to the narrative.
