FOLLOW US

Alito’s View: Protecting Officers or Undermining Accountability?

Justice Alito’s dissent is essentially a full-throated defense of qualified immunity. His concern? That police officers shouldn’t have to worry about lawsuits when making split-second decisions.

“To overcome qualified immunity, a party must show that an official violated a federal right that was ‘clearly established’ at the time of the alleged misconduct,” Alito wrote.

In other words, Pina could not have known that killing Dominguez would expose him to a civil lawsuit because, according to Alito, the law wasn’t "clear enough" at the time.

Legal scholars like UCLA Law Professor Joanna C. Schwartz argue that this reasoning is flawed. “The notion that you have to find a prior court decision with nearly identical facts in order to clearly establish the law can be a very high barrier,” Schwartz said.

Even if Peck had been decided before the shooting, it’s unlikely Pina would have been aware of it in the heat of the moment. Officers don’t memorize legal precedents; they’re trained on general principles of law. That’s why courts have to interpret whether force was justified after the fact.

The Bigger Picture: Qualified Immunity and Its Impact

This case is yet another example of the deep flaws in the qualified immunity doctrine. While the Supreme Court insists the rule is needed to prevent frivolous lawsuits against officers, research suggests it does little to achieve that goal. Schwartz’s studies indicate that most excessive force claims are not dismissed on qualified immunity grounds.

And here’s a reality check: even when officers are found liable, they rarely pay out of pocket. Studies show that police departments and cities almost always foot the bill. So, the idea that officers are constantly at risk of personal financial ruin? It’s a myth.

The bigger danger isn’t to officers — it’s to communities. When qualified immunity is applied too broadly, it shields bad cops just as much as good ones. And in cases like Dominguez’s, it prevents families from getting justice.

As for Alito’s outrage? It’s misplaced. The courts ruled in favor of Dominguez’s widow because they were right to do so. And if you ask Dominguez’s children, they’d probably tell you that $1 million isn’t nearly enough.

• Court Decisions & Case Law:
  • Peck v. Montoya(2022) - [Link]
  • Cruz v. City of Anaheim(2014) - [Link]
  • Qualified Immunity Overview - [Link]
• Legal Analysis: For a deeper dive into legal analysis without the jargon, join my Patreon community, Legal Insights and Strategies by Samuel Lopez, for exclusive content, templates, and insider tips.