FOLLOW US

The Common Thread Is State Power as Entertainment

The Patriot Games, the citizenship-show proposal, and abortion bans are not identical policies, and I am not arguing that they are. One is an approved athletic competition. One was an unapproved television pitch. The others are laws enacted by individual states after the Supreme Court removed federal constitutional protections for abortion.

The connection is not administrative. It is cultural.

Each places the government in the role of producer, casting director, judge, or controller. Officials choose teenagers to perform patriotism. They imagine immigrants as contestants proving their worth. State laws force women to continue pregnancies under rules politicians wrote.

The Trump era increasingly feels like a national programming slate where public policy is designed for spectacle. The government does not simply announce a youth competition. It gives the event a dramatic title and turns regional representation into a televised showdown.

It does not simply debate immigration law. A proposal emerges in which citizenship becomes the final prize after a season of themed challenges. It does not merely oppose abortion. The movement celebrates the destruction of a constitutional protection, transfers control to state lawmakers, and expects women to absorb the medical consequences.

This is governance shaped by the instincts of reality television: create conflict, assign roles, control the setting, reward compliance, and keep the audience watching.

Reality Television Has Become a Governing Instinct

Trump built his public identity through reality television, so the pattern is difficult to ignore. The Apprentice trained audiences to see him as the man in charge. He decided who succeeded, who failed, and who deserved removal.

Now the country is the set, and the public has been cast as contestants. The difference is that real government does not reset after the credits roll. The consequences follow people home, into hospitals, across borders, and through the rest of their lives.

A Government Obsessed With Casting the “Right” Americans

The Patriot Games reveal something deeper about this administration’s view of national identity. The competition does not only ask which young athletes are strongest or fastest. Its original format divides representation into one young man and one young woman from each state and territory, and Trump immediately connected that structure to his campaign against transgender participation in women’s sports.

The competition therefore stages the administration’s definition of who qualifies as a proper male or female representative. It is not only about athletic ability. It is also about displaying the identities the administration considers legitimate.

The citizenship-show proposal carried a similar message. Immigrants would prove their knowledge, usefulness, personality, and cultural fit through televised challenges. The underlying question was not merely whether they qualified under federal law. It was whether they could perform an entertaining version of Americanness for an audience.

Women living under abortion bans face another government-imposed definition of their role. Once pregnant, their autonomy becomes secondary to a state policy that requires the pregnancy to continue, sometimes even when serious medical complications arise.

These groups face different policies, but the same instinct appears each time. Officials define the acceptable boy, girl, immigrant, and woman from above. Then the government decides who may compete, who may belong, who must comply, and who gets written out of the script.