FOLLOW US

Inside the Story

• Independent evidence, not tied to Trump or government actors, uncovered serious allegations against James.
• Referral alleges James falsified mortgage documents for lower interest rates on two properties.
• FHFA Director's referral to DOJ outlines potential violations including bank fraud, wire fraud, and false statements.

By Samuel A. Lopez – USA Herald

[NEW YORK] - In a stunning turn of events, a meticulously detailed criminal referral from the U.S. Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has placed New York Attorney General Letitia James under serious scrutiny. The allegations, backed by what appears to be strong and compelling evidence, claim that James engaged in mortgage fraud — the very type of fraud she has accused Donald Trump of committing.

Despite James' public narrative that these accusations are simply part of a "witch hunt" orchestrated by Donald Trump allies, a deeper examination reveals that much of the evidence was uncovered by an independent citizen investigator, not tied to any political faction. The referral, submitted to the Department of Justice on April 14, 2025, by FHFA Director William J. Pulte, presents a damning case.

According to the referral, James allegedly falsified residence status and property records to obtain more favorable mortgage terms for properties in Norfolk, Virginia and Brooklyn, New York. If proven true, such actions could violate multiple federal laws, including:

• 18 U.S.C. § 1343 (Wire Fraud)
• 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (Mail Fraud)
• 18 U.S.C. § 1344 (Bank Fraud)
• 18 U.S.C. § 1014 (False Statements to a Financial Institution)

Two Properties, Two Disturbing Patterns

The FHFA referral lays out two primary incidents of alleged fraud:

1. Norfolk, Virginia Residence

In August 2023, James, through her agent, purchased a home in Norfolk, VA, affirming on mortgage documents that it would be her "primary residence." However, James was at the time a sitting New York State official, legally required to reside primarily in New York. Adding to the evidence, building permits filed in New York in July 2024 listed her New York property as "James Residence" and "Remain Occupied," casting serious doubt on her claim to make Virginia her primary home.

Primary residence mortgages are known to offer lower interest rates than second-home loans because they are deemed less risky by lenders. Misrepresenting primary residence status, as alleged here, would allow a borrower to improperly secure preferential rates.

2. Brooklyn, New York Property

In 2001, James purchased a five-unit building in Brooklyn but allegedly misrepresented it as a four-unit dwelling to qualify for a conforming loan from Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac. Under federal guidelines, conforming loans are only available for properties with four units or fewer.

James allegedly continued to misrepresent the property’s size over the years, including during a 2011 Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) application and a 2019 refinancing. Conforming loans and HAMP benefits would have given her access to lower rates and more favorable terms that she otherwise would not have qualified for.

Pattern of Deception?

Perhaps even more troubling, the FHFA report highlights that mortgage fraud may not be new behavior for James. Historical records show that in 1983 and again in 2000, James signed mortgage documents with incorrect information — including representing herself and her father as "husband and wife" to obtain favorable terms.

An even deeper look into the evidence, reveals that her name was misspelled on a title deed as “Lititua” James, with some speculating this was done intentionally in order to skew her identity from being exposed through these publicly available documents.

Such long-running patterns, if true, would seriously undermine her fitness for office, as they directly violate Rules 8.4(b) and 8.4(c) of the New York Rules of Professional Conduct, which prohibit lawyers from engaging in fraud or conduct involving dishonesty, deceit, or misrepresentation.

Experts Weigh In

Dan Epstein, Vice President of America First Legal, remarked, "If what Director Pulte uncovered is true, then we have a sitting state Attorney General who made false certifications to the United States in return for federal benefits. But why worry about committing fraud against American taxpayers when you are willing to buck your ethical duties to the bar? For a state prosecutor who has maligned the President of the United States for political gain, public accountability will serve as a cure to Letitia James’ endless lawfare and abuse of power."

Nick Barry, Senior Counsel at America First Legal, added, "The Attorney General of New York should be transparent about the allegations raised by the Director of U.S. Federal Housing Finance Agency. The best way to restore trust in the legal profession is for the Committee of Professional Standards to investigate the allegations that Attorney General Letitia James engaged in potential fraud for her financial benefit. If the Director’s allegations are accurate, Ms. James should resign her office immediately, the people of New York deserve an Attorney General who upholds the highest ethical standards of the legal profession."

Stephen Miller, President of America First Legal, also weighed in, emphasizing that the Committee on Professional Standards has the authority not only to disbar James but also to recommend criminal charges if the evidence supports it. Miller, a senior advisor in the Trump administration, has shown a reputation for thorough, evidence-based legal strategy — signaling that this complaint was not made lightly.

The Stakes Are High

This case strikes at the heart of the credibility of the New York Attorney General's office. It also raises broader concerns about the double standard James herself warned against: "there cannot be two systems of justice," and “Nobody is above the law.”

The charges she pursued against political opponents, including Donald Trump, were premised on allegations of financial misrepresentation. If the evidence against her proves accurate, the irony will not be lost on the public or legal community.

Unlike James' claims that these charges are simply politically motivated, the referral is anchored by hard documents, including: